With Microsoft Project being retired in favor of Planner, many organizations are deciding whether to stay within its ecosystem or move to another project management platform. Microsoft Planner vs Asana is a close comparison because both support project scheduling, portfolios, and workload tracking, but they take different approaches to managing work across teams. Below, I break down where each platform performs better across pricing, task management, AI, resource planning, and ease of use.
Microsoft Planner vs Asana comparison
| My rating | (Winner by a narrow margin) |
|
| Best for | ||
| Free plan | ||
| Starting price | ||
| Task management | ||
| AI | ||
| Collaboration | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| Integrations |
How I evaluated Microsoft Planner vs Asana
I scored Microsoft Planner and Asana using a weighted rubric based on the capabilities and buying considerations I prioritize when reviewing project management software.
Pricing (20%): I compared annual subscription costs, free access, and trial availability. I also considered how much functionality each platform includes at different pricing tiers.
General features (25%): I evaluated the core tools teams rely on to plan and manage projects, including task management, scheduling, and project views. I also reviewed collaboration capabilities and time tracking where available.
Advanced & niche features (20%): I assessed capabilities designed for more complex project requirements, with particular attention to portfolio management and resource planning. AI functionality and workflow automation also contributed to this score.
Ease of use (10%): I considered how quickly a new user could navigate each platform and create a project. I also evaluated the amount of configuration required before teams could begin managing work.
Support (10%): I compared the support channels available to customers and the accessibility of self-service resources. I also considered whether access to direct support changes by subscription tier.
Expert score (15%): My expert score reflects my assessment of each platform based on hands-on testing and my experience reviewing project management software. I considered the overall feature set and how each product approaches common project management requirements.
Why you can trust TechRepublic |
| I’ve spent the past four years testing nearly 20 project management platforms, and some of them have become part of my workflow. Writing dozens of PM software guides for businesses of all sizes taught me what individuals and teams need from these tools beyond the marketing pitch. I also build custom scoring rubrics for each review to ensure fairness and that selected platforms get evaluated on the same criteria.
|
Marianne SisonPricing
Winner: Microsoft Planner
Microsoft Planner is the more affordable option, especially for organizations already using Microsoft 365. Basic Planner capabilities are included with eligible Microsoft 365 subscriptions, which eliminates the need for a separate project app subscription. For teams that need more functionality, Planner Plan 1 costs $10 per user per month, while the next paid tier bumps costs to $30 per user per month.
Asana also has a free Personal plan, though it is limited to two users. Its first paid tier, Starter, costs $10.99 per user per month with annual billing, which puts it close to Planner Plan 1. Advanced costs $24.99 per user per month and includes access to portfolios and workload management.
| Free access | ||
| Entry-level plan | ||
| Mid-tier plan | ||
| Enterprise pricing | ||
| AI pricing | ||
Task management
Winner: Asana
Both Asana and Microsoft Planner provide core task management capabilities, but Asana gives teams more options for organizing tasks across projects. Its standout feature, multi-homing, allows multiple teams to manage a shared task across projects. Combined with custom fields and workflow rules, this gives project managers more control over how work progresses across departments.
One area where Planner has an advantage is dependency scheduling, with support for four relationship types: finish-to-start, start-to-start, finish-to-finish, and start-to-finish. Users can also assign tasks, set priorities, create recurring work, and organize tasks with labels or buckets. For tightly sequenced work, Planner can recalculate scheduled dates when changes affect dependent tasks.
Workflow customization
Winner: Asana
Asana offers more native workflow customization than Microsoft Planner, with tools that let teams adapt processes to different types of work. Custom fields capture project data, while rules automate actions when tasks meet predefined conditions.
For organizations that need to standardize tasks, Asana Bundles package custom fields, rules, sections, and templates into a reusable workflow. Changes made to a bundle apply to every project that uses it, reducing the need to update projects individually. Teams can also use forms to standardize incoming requests and task templates to predefine task details for recurring work.
AI & automation
Winner: Asana
Asana is the better choice for teams that want more control over AI-powered workflows. AI Studio lets you build no-code workflows where AI can analyze incoming work and determine the next action. For example, it can review a submitted request, classify it according to predefined criteria, then route it to the appropriate person or phase. Asana also provides Smart Status, Smart Summaries, and Smart Fields to help teams generate quick project updates.
Microsoft Planner is more appealing for organizations that already use Microsoft Copilot. Its main AI assistant, Planner Agent, can create and update tasks, answer questions about project work, and generate status reports. Teams can also assign tasks to the agent, which can produce content based on task details and attached files.
Planner and Asana also differ in how they approach automation. Asana combines its native rules engine with AI Studio, which allows teams to build automated processes within their projects. Planner uses Microsoft Power Automate for more extensive automation across Planner and other Microsoft apps, benefiting organizations that rely heavily on the Microsoft ecosystem.
Resource and portfolio management
Winner: Asana
When it comes to managing concurrent projects, Asana has the advantage because its portfolio and workload features provide more detailed tracking. Workload shows each team member’s assignments and measures effort by hours, points, or percentage allocation. Portfolio Workload combines assignments from related projects, while Universal Workload gives an overview of each member’s commitments across the organization.
Asana also connects resource planning with its portfolio capabilities. Portfolios centralize project status, progress, timelines, and ownership, while giving managers access to workload data so they can review capacity and redistribute tasks when needed.
Microsoft Planner supports workload management through People view, where managers can review how tasks are distributed within a project and reassign work as needed. With the portfolio feature, managers can track dates and progress across multiple Planner projects from one roadmap. However, Planner does not combine resource capacity across multiple projects, giving Asana an advantage for organizations that need a consolidated view of employee workloads.
Ease of use
Winner: Microsoft Planner
Microsoft Planner is easier to adopt for organizations with existing Microsoft 365 accounts, and its clean interface can also make it less overwhelming for beginners. Teams can access Planner through familiar tools such as Teams, while its task boards and buckets keep project setup relatively simple.
Asana is also relatively easy to start with, but it gives teams more options to configure projects upon setup. Users can choose different project views, add custom fields, create rules, and build templates for custom workflows. Those options provide more flexibility, but they can also require more setup as teams add more complex processes.
Planner is the simpler choice for teams that want to start managing tasks quickly inside the Microsoft ecosystem. However, it offers fewer workflow configuration options than Asana, which gives organizations more flexibility to customize processes based on their requirements.
Asana vs Microsoft Planner alternatives
Microsoft Planner and Asana cover a wide range of project management needs, but other platforms may suit teams that want more customization, native collaboration tools, or comprehensive reporting. The alternatives below are worth considering if neither platform meets your project management needs.
(billed annually) |
|||
| monday.com | Customizable workflows | Highly configurable boards and workflow automations for teams that need more flexibility than Planner offers. | |
| ClickUp | Consolidating work tools | AI-powered workspace that combines chat, time tracking, and sprint management | |
| Wrike | Complex enterprise workflows | Provides configurable workflows and detailed reporting for more complex operational processes. |
Microsoft Planner vs Asana: Which one should you choose?
Ultimately, the decision comes down to your existing tech stack and project complexity. Asana provides more project management functionality within the platform, while Planner offers a more seamless extension of Microsoft 365.
Choose Asana if your team needs more flexibility for managing work across multiple projects and departments. It also suits organizations where portfolio management and capacity planning are priorities.
Microsoft Planner is the better choice if your organization uses Microsoft 365. It provides a simpler setup and connects project work with tools such as Teams and Power Automate. Premium capabilities also cover dependencies, workload visibility, and portfolio tracking for organizations that need more than basic task management.
FAQs
Is Microsoft Planner better than Asana?
Microsoft Planner is better for organizations already using Microsoft 365 and wanting simple task management inside that ecosystem. Asana is better for teams that need more workflow customization, cross-project task management, and resource planning.
Which is easier to use, Microsoft Planner or Asana?
Microsoft Planner is generally easier to set up for teams already familiar with Microsoft 365. Asana offers more configuration options, which can require more setup but provide greater control over workflows.
Can Asana replace Microsoft Planner?
Yes, Asana can replace Microsoft Planner for task and project management, especially if your team needs more customization or cross-project coordination. However, teams that rely heavily on Microsoft 365 may prefer Planner because of its native Microsoft integrations.
